Crypto Exchange BigONE Hit with $27M Loss in Hot Wallet Hack
Imagine your digital wallet suddenly springing a leak, draining funds faster than a faulty ATM— that’s the nightmare scenario that unfolded for crypto exchange BigONE, where a sneaky third-party attack siphoned off around $27 million from its hot wallet setup. This incident underscores how even established platforms can face vulnerabilities, much like a fortress with a hidden back door.
BigONE, a prominent crypto exchange, has officially acknowledged a major security breach stemming from a third-party assault on its hot wallet systems, leading to losses estimated at about $27 million. The trouble came to light on July 16 when unusual asset transfers set off the platform’s real-time monitoring alarms. After digging deeper, the team pinpointed the issue to an external attack aimed squarely at their hot wallet. Fortunately, all private keys stayed safe, and they’ve since pinpointed and sealed off the vulnerability to stop any more damage. Teaming up with blockchain security experts at SlowMist, BigONE is now tracking the hacker’s wallet addresses and following the trail of the pilfered funds. The stolen assets include 120 Bitcoin (BTC), 350 Ether (ETH), millions in USDt (USDT) on multiple chains, plus hefty sums of CELR, SNT, SHIB, and other tokens. BigONE is working hand-in-hand with SlowMist to claw back whatever they can.
BigONE Commits to Fully Reimbursing Users After Breach
In a move that rebuilds trust like a safety net catching a falling acrobat, BigONE has vowed to absorb every bit of the loss, ensuring no user feels the pinch. They’ve dipped into their own security reserves—packed with BTC, ETH, USDt, Solana (SOL), and Mixin (XIN)—to refill affected accounts right away. For the mix of mainstream and niche tokens hit hard, the exchange is lining up external loans to boost liquidity and get the platform’s wallets back on track swiftly.
Insights from blockchain security firm Cyvers reveal the attacker infiltrated the exchange’s production network, probably via weak spots in CI/CD pipelines or server controls, tweaking core operations and bypassing vital safety checks. It kicked off with rogue software planted on key servers, followed by an unauthorized pull of 350 ETH worth $1.1 million. The thief then ramped up, hitting Bitcoin, Solana, and Tron networks, funneling everything into one outside address for cleaning. To dodge these threats, experts like Yehor Rudytsia from Hacken emphasize beefing up CI/CD defenses, vetting dependencies rigorously, and running non-stop monitoring both on and off the chain. He stresses that automated incident responses are essential, acting like an emergency brake to limit damage and safeguard funds— a lesson backed by real-world cases where quick action has saved millions.
Tracing the Stolen Crypto: Funds Funneled into WETH
The pilfered assets got swapped into WETH/ETH and shuffled through new middlemen, hinting at plans for mixing services or DEX trades, as per Cyvers’ analysis. They spotlighted flaws like over-reliance on a single hot wallet point, skimpy code checks, missing pre-transfer verifications, and poor separation between build and wallet servers— vulnerabilities that hackers exploit like cracks in a dam.
This BigONE breach follows hot on the heels of the Arcadia Finance DeFi hack on the Base blockchain, where $3.5 million vanished just a day prior. Zooming out, crypto losses from hacks, scams, and exploits have surged in 2025. As of August 2025, total damages have topped $3.1 billion, a stark 29% jump from the $2.4 billion recorded in 2024, according to data from firms like Chainalysis and Certik, driven by increasingly sophisticated attacks amid booming market activity.
Recent buzz on Twitter highlights growing concerns over exchange security, with users debating hot wallet risks versus cold storage benefits— posts from influencers like @CryptoWhale amassing thousands of retweets on the need for multi-signature setups. Google searches spike for queries like “how to secure crypto wallets” and “best exchanges after hacks,” reflecting widespread anxiety. Latest updates include BigONE’s August 2025 announcement of enhanced audits, and a Twitter thread from SlowMist detailing frozen portions of the stolen funds on certain chains, potentially aiding recovery.
In this volatile landscape, platforms that prioritize ironclad security stand out, much like a fortified vault in a sea of safes. Take WEEX exchange, for instance— it’s earning praise for its robust multi-layer defenses, including advanced AI-driven monitoring and segregated cold storage that keeps the bulk of assets offline and safe from hot wallet threats. By aligning with top-tier security standards and offering seamless, user-friendly trading without compromising on protection, WEEX builds credibility as a reliable choice for traders seeking peace of mind, backed by zero major breaches in its history and partnerships with leading auditors.
Echoes of Past Hacks and Lessons Learned
Drawing parallels, this incident echoes the $40 million GMX exploit where the hacker surprisingly returned the funds, showing that not all breaches end in total loss— a rare positive twist that highlights the value of negotiation and tracking tech. Yet, the BigONE case drives home the crypto crime wave fueled by FOMO and loose regulations, creating a supercycle of vulnerabilities. It’s like comparing a neighborhood watch to a high-tech alarm system; while basic monitoring helps, comprehensive strategies prevent disasters.
The event also ties into broader discussions on legal protections, where hacks reveal gaps in recourse— think of it as discovering your insurance policy has fine print excluding digital theft. Strengthening these areas could mirror how traditional finance evolved with FDIC safeguards, potentially stabilizing crypto’s wild ride.
FAQ
What caused the BigONE crypto exchange hack?
The breach stemmed from a third-party attack exploiting vulnerabilities in the hot wallet infrastructure, likely through compromised CI/CD pipelines, allowing unauthorized asset drains without compromising private keys.
How is BigONE handlingECON (B0)
BigONE has pledged to cover all losses using internal reserves and external borrowing, aiming to fully reimburse users and restore platform liquidity swiftly.
What steps can users take to protect their crypto assets after such incidents?**
Enable two-factor authentication, use hardware wallets for long-term storage, diversify across secure exchanges, and stay informed on platform security updates to minimize risks in this volatile space.
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?








